Q2 2006: Auto Adjudication Survey
SURVEY COMPLETED AND CLOSED. The AA survey included two questions.
Question 1. How long would it take to identify and implement initiative to
improve your Auto-Adjudication Rate (AA RAte) by 5%?
-
___ 3 months
-
___ 6 months
-
___ 1 year
-
___ 2 years
Question 2. Rank the following in terms of negative impact on
your Auto Adjudication Rate?
-
______ Benefit plan complexity
-
______ Provider contract complexity
-
______ Data entry and input quality
-
______ Other system constraints
-
__________________ Other
AA Survey: Question 1 Results
Most payers can increase their AA rate by 5 % in less than 6 months.
Question 1. How long would it take to identify and implement initiative to
improve your Auto-Adjudication Rate (AA RAte) by 5%?
Summary. Most payers can increase their AA rate by 5 % in less than 6 months.
It has been said by a number of management gurus that the key factor which
will determine which organizations will still be functioning in five years
is the ability to quickly improve and change processes. Based on our survey
results, healthcare payors may be more responsive in terms of changing their
processes than they’re commonly given credit for being.
Sixteen of the twenty
one respondants (over 75% -- 21 useable responses, 32 total responses received,
350 plans surveyed) said they could increase their AA rate by 5% in six months
or less. That’s pretty impressive when you consider that an initiative to
increase AA typically passes through three steps: data analysis to identify
an initiative, an approval process to initiate implementation, and an
implementation process typically involving system resources. Executing
on these steps within a six month window requires focus and coordination.
On the other hand, five of the respondents said a five percent increase in
AA would require a year or more. Without knowing more about the specific
barriers these payors face, a starting point for speeding their AA
improvement efforts is to review the three AA improvement steps to
find the barrier.
AA Survey: Question 2 Results
Benefit Plan and Provider Contract Complexity have the biggest
negative impact on auto-adjudication.
Question 2. Rank the following in terms of negative impact on
your Auto Adjudication Rate?
Summary. Benefit Plan and Provider Contract Complexity have the biggest
negative impact on auto-adjudication.
If you think benefit plan and provider contract complexity have the largest
negative impacts on auto-adjudication for your health plan -- you’re not alone.
Of the 22 useable survey responses (32 total responses received, 350 plans
surveyed), twelve payors responded that benefit plan complexity had the
largest negative impact on their auto-adjudication rate.
Thirteen payors
responded that provider contracts were the second largest negative impact
on their auto-adjudication rate. If an adjudicated claim is a benefit plan
and a provider contract coming together to create a finalized claim, the fact
that these two are key process drivers (i.e. drive auto-adjudication) is no
surprise. For those working on improving their AA rate, have a second look at
the pend codes related to provider contracts and benefit plans (at the individual
pend code level and as a group). Additionally, three payors responded that input
quality had the largest negative impact and three others responded that system
constraints were their biggest barrier. For payors with systems or data entry
problems, review your data entry strategy with the various vendors (a number
of excellent vendors exist) and/or review your system functionality with system
vendors.