Analytics Home

The ClaimHeader offers analytics in support of claims process best practices.

Perhaps one of the murkiest areas in claims is performance measurement. On the other hand, the claims process is a data driven process -- which means performance can be measured. Understanding, managing and improving it requires data and the analytics to interpret the data. The ClaimHeader provides those resources in this section:

  1. Claim Metric Definitions. How do payers define the metrics they use to manage themselves? Are there 'standard' definitions for such metrics as denial rate or EDI rate? The simple answer is that there are industry standards but that they are not shared or widely understood. Each Claim Metric definition includes a step through definition of a particular claims metric, an explanation for how a particular metric is used in an operational setting (incuding usage tips), a set of potential pitfalls, a description of variations, and a set of implementation tips (including common data elements).
  2. Survey Results. As with most business processes, the claims process has many aspects that can be measured across payers. For example, what is a typical EDI rate for a payer? The ClaimHeader surveys both operational performance and other claim related areas and shares signicant portions of these surveys. As noted in the survey section, we have processes in place to protect the identities of payers while at the same time enabling them to gather information to help better understand and manage their own operations.
  3. 100 Claims -- Benchmark Library. Our experience with benchmarks has been that they can be quite confusing. Our 100 Claims Series is intended to make it easy to gather and interpret claims process benchmarks. In a nutshell, if there were only 100 claims, how many would be (UB92 versus HCFA), (EDI versus paper), (paid versus denied)...?
  4. Claim Term Glossary. The claims process, like many large processes, has its own language. Our glossary is designed to make it easy to find and define claims process related terms and acronyms.

company logo Benchmark

Claim Attachments

17 Year Attachment Trend -- 1990 to 2007 (bar Graph)

According to our surveys and anecdotes the volume of claims with an attachment has dropped. The numbers we have indicate that between 1990 and 2007 claims with attachments have fallen from 1 in 5 claims to 1 in 20.

company logo 100 Claims

For 100 Typical Claims: 31 UB-92/facility and 69 HCFA/Professional

Common rule of thumb: By volume 70% of claims are professional (HCFA) and 30% are facilty (UB).

Log In


 

 

company logo Surveys

There are two surveys for Q2 2007:

EDI Survey

Goal: Gather the latest EDI trends

COB Survey

Goal: Gather the latest Claim Coordination and COB trends

Industry Calendar

Consumer Directed Healthcare Conference April 2007 -- Las Vegas

Institute 2007 - AHIP's Annual Meeting June 2007 -- Las Vegas

About the Publisher:

The ClaimHeader is published quarterly by Datamethod. To learn more about us, please visit our website at www.datamethod.com.